Kuber Vansh

The seven decisions of a liquidity event.

Most of the lasting consequences of a stake sale or IPO are decided in the months around the transaction — not at signing.

[ Senior Partner ]·8 April 2026·4 min read

A founder's first liquidity event is usually understood as a single decision: to sell, or not. The truth is more complicated. The transaction itself is one of seven decisions made in close sequence — and the other six tend to compound longer.

We have walked alongside families through stake sales, IPOs, secondaries, and family settlements over many cycles. The pattern is consistent. The transaction takes most of the legal attention; the other six decisions take most of the lifetime impact.

Decision 1: Whether the family balance sheet should be created at all

Until a liquidity event, most promoter wealth is conflated with operating wealth. The family does not have a balance sheet; it has a business with personal assets attached. The first decision is whether to formally separate the two — and how aggressively. The aggressive version creates a family investment company or trust; the conservative version simply consolidates personal accounts. The choice has tax, governance, and succession implications for decades.

Decision 2: How much of the proceeds should remain liquid

The instinct after a transaction is to deploy quickly — into a private equity allocation, a real estate portfolio, a structured product. This is almost always premature. A reasonable family balance sheet keeps 12–24 months of expected outflows in cash and money-market instruments, and deploys the rest in tranches over 12–36 months. The cost of holding liquid is small; the cost of redeploying mistakes is large.

Decision 3: How the family will allocate, conceptually

Allocation is not "what funds shall we buy"; it is "what is this money for, and on what horizon". Different buckets serve different purposes — the lifestyle bucket, the legacy bucket, the philanthropy bucket, the next-generation bucket. Each has a horizon and a risk profile. The mistake is to design one allocation for all of them.

Decision 4: How tax efficiency will be architected

A liquidity event triggers capital gains, often at scale. The architecture — through HUFs, trusts, family LLPs, gift planning, residency status — must be designed before the transaction closes. Almost every retrofit costs more than the original work would have. The most expensive sentence in our practice is, "we'll figure out the tax structuring after the deal closes".

Decision 5: How the next generation will be involved

A liquidity event makes the family's wealth visible. It is often the first time children become aware of the scale. How they are inducted matters: too fast and capital becomes a substitute for vocation; too slow and they inherit responsibility without literacy. The right pace is family-specific, but the conversation should not be deferred.

Decision 6: How philanthropy will be structured

Most promoter families intend to give. Few think about how. A liquidity event is the cleanest moment to set up the giving architecture — a private foundation, a family trust, a directed CSR vehicle — because it allows tax-efficient corpus formation and a long enough horizon to reflect the family's intent. Philanthropy designed in haste becomes either ineffective or accidentally personal.

Decision 7: The advisor question

Finally, the family must decide what kind of ongoing advice it wants. Is it a single multi-family office coordinating everything? A set of specialists who do not talk to each other? A family member taking it on? An in-house team? Most families default — they keep working with whoever was around when the transaction happened. The default is rarely the optimal answer.

The cost of getting them out of order

These seven decisions interlock. The allocation depends on the tax structure. The tax structure depends on the family entity. The family entity depends on the next-generation plan. The philanthropy depends on the corpus design. Sequence matters as much as substance.

In our practice, we ask families to commit to no irreversible deployments for the first sixty days post-transaction. The discipline saves more than any single product recommendation will earn over the same period.

Written by
[ Senior Partner ]
Partner, Investments
Receive new notes by email

We send only when there's something worth saying — typically once or twice a month.

A short note is all it takes to start.

First conversations are always with a senior partner — without obligation, without product, and without a clock running.